Reviewed by Gerti
The
movie “Still Alice” is based on the book of the same name by Lisa
Genova. It stars Julianne Moore as Alice Howland, a 50-year-old woman
whose life is overturned by Early-Onset Alzheimer’s disease. I read
the book several months ago, and therefore was very excited to see
the movie version, hoping it would put into poignant pictures what
Genova had so terrifyingly described in her book, but the book is
much better than the film.
The
movie story is pretty much the same, but I am bothered by the petty
differences, because I can’t see why they were changed. For
example, in the book, Alice is a Harvard professor. In the movie
version, she is a professor at Columbia, and therefore lives in New
York rather than Boston. My husband thinks the change was made
because the New York Film commission offered the movie makers more
money, or was more accommodating, but still I find the change
disturbing. In the book, Alice’s husband wants to move her to New
York where he is offered a better job, so it is jarring for me to see
her story start there.
Another
change I think occurred because the screenwriter was a man, rather
than a woman. The book was devastating to read because as Alice’s
condition worsens, her husband draws away from her, saying about his
move from Boston where she is comfortable to New York that it
wouldn’t matter to her anyway, because she “wouldn’t know the
difference” by the time they moved. That was a pivotal moment in
the book, because while their kids are horrified that he can even
think that way, it is a factual statement. Alice’s degeneration is
so rapid, that she eventually doesn’t feel comfortable in the home
where she’s spent the last several decades. But the screenwriter
doesn’t use that line or that entire scene, and I think its
omission is a mistake. While not critical to the action, the line is
key to understanding the attitude not only of Alice’s husband about
her condition, but about how her family and the world at large views
Alice and her disease. With her memory failing, she is reduced by
them to the status of an object, not given credit for emotion or
decision-making abilities, even about her own care.
The
film is also less impactful than the book because the book is written
in first-person narrative, and since the film does not share that
point of view, it really loses out as Alice’s condition worsens.
One of the most poignant things about the book is that the reader
sees Alice’s ability to define and describe her world become
smaller. Her vocabulary shrinks, her ability to recognize even her
family members shrinks, and that is so much more evident in the book
than the movie.
Those
critiques aside, however, “Still Alice” is a moving portrayal in
microcosm of what it is like to lose your memory and hence
“yourself”. Alice states in the film that she wishes she had
cancer, because the world can sympathize with a cancer patient.
Having Alzheimer’s though drives people away, as it takes from her
everything it meant to be Alice. The movie’s ending seemed abrupt,
and several scenes are not described clearly, but the 101 minutes
flew by for me. I wish the film makers had given the book’s telling
of Alice’s story more weight. Great acting performance by Julianne
Moore, but lacking the depth and heart of Genova’s book.