Submitted by Gerti
There
are so many fans of Jane Austen’s “Pride and Prejudice,” and so
many authors who have taken that classic 18th
century novel and written satellite books which hover around its
story and characters. The temptation would be to see Jo Baker’s
book as just one of that pack. But hers is a different take on the
classic romance, and even though Baker occasionally drops in lines
and scenes from the original (which are like seeing an old friend in
a crowd for me), Baker tells her story from the Longbourn servant’s
vantage point. For those who are not familiar with the Austen
original, Longbourn is the name of the house in which Elizabeth
Bennet, heroine of “Pride and Prejudice”, and her memorable
family live.
As
far as I recall, only the servant Mrs. Hill is mentioned in the
original, as Elizabeth’s mother, Mrs. Bennet, is constantly
requesting her presence to do work for her. But of course there would
also be a man servant in a gentleman’s house at that time, and in
Baker’s book, that is Mr. Hill, a gay man who uses Mrs. Hill as his
beard. Mrs. Hill doesn’t mind, because she has a few secrets of her
own, including that she had a love child with Mr. Bennet (Elizabeth’s
bookish father) before he got married. That union produced a son,
whom Mr. Bennet has never acknowledged, but who has found work at
Longbourn. There are also two kitchen maids on the Bennet payroll,
and of course, one of them eventually falls in love with this son of
Mrs. Hill and Mr. Bennet.
I’ll
admit I am a traditionalist, so like many readers, I have notions of
the characters even beyond what Jane Austen wrote (and probably
meant) them to be. So to my mind, these changes and alterations are
disturbing. As readers and fans of the films no doubt remember, the
Bennets do not have a son (only 5 daughters), which means that when
Mr. Bennet dies, the girls can’t keep living in the house – as it
is what is called “entailed” to the humorously officious
clergyman, Mr. Collins. That causes much grief for the Bennets, and
leads to a battle between Mrs. Bennet and Elizabeth after Elizabeth
refuses Mr. Collins’ marriage proposal, even though it would keep
the house in the family. I don’t like that Mr. Bennet has a child
out of wedlock, just as I don’t like that he didn’t marry Mrs.
Hill when he got his servant pregnant, whatever the morals of the
time
Baker
must take great joy in these relationships which push the envelope on
18th
century mores. She has one of the kitchen maids fall for a black
servant of the Bingley’s, and has the same girl sleep with Mrs.
Hill’s son before marriage. She clearly shows the scoundrel
Wickham’s affinity for young girls, as he trifles with another,
younger kitchen maid at Longbourn. And of course there is the matter
of Mr. Hill’s hidden homosexuality. Baker seems to glory in lifting
the moral rock of the time, showing us the slime underneath. And
while I love stories about the Regency, the intent to sully its
innocence seems a bit deliberate to me. The book’s prime saving
grace is that Baker looks in-depth at a Regency servant’s endless
work hours and often back-breaking chores, a view rarely seen today.






