Submitted by Gerti
I
have read several books by Malcolm Gladwell already, including
“Tipping Point,” “Blink”, “Outliers,” and “What the Dog
Saw.” In short, he’s been one of my favorite authors for years
now. Several of those books (including “Outliers” and “Blink”)
were downright brilliant, so it was with great expectations that I
picked up his newest, “David and Goliath: Underdogs, Misfits and
the Art of Battling Giants.” Sadly, it does not live up to the
brilliance of some of those earlier works.
As
the title might indicate, “David and Goliath” is the story of how
improbably one-sided battles can be won by the underdog, how
disadvantages can turn out to be advantages. And like many of his
books, it includes research and interviews with people who are living
examples of the point he is trying to make.
His
first story involves why David beat Goliath. This is a famous story
from the Bible, in which a shepherd boy goes against a giant war hero
who makes even other soldiers tremble, and wins the day with his
slingshot and several well-chosen rocks. Gladwell shows how despite
appearances, it was Goliath who was at a disadvantage in this battle,
due to his acromegaly and poor eyesight. But the point really is that
David won by changing the rules. Goliath was only good at
hand-to-hand combat, but David using the slingshot to fight him
changed the rules enough to insure his success.
Likewise,
Gladwell shows how having dyslexia or losing a parent as a child can
make a person either a brilliant success or a pathetic failure. Using
examples like Richard Branson, Charles Schwab, and several presidents
(including Barack Obama), Gladwell demonstrates how these perceived
disadvantages made these men work harder and find tricks and
shortcuts that allowed them to succeed. It’s a subject he’s
touched on before – how 10,000 hours of hard work and not natural
talent can make one an expert at something. And since these men spent
so much time overcoming obstacles, they became more capable than
those who had never had to face obstacles before.
This
would be good book for teachers and school administrators as it talks
about the value of small class sizes (of lack thereof), but all of
Gladwell’s books have clues about how teachers and schools can make
students, even the most disadvantaged among them, succeed. Still this
work left me strangely unaffected, despite Gladwell’s easy-to-read
style and interesting subject matter. The lessons learned from it are
also unarguably valid – work harder to succeed, change the rules if
you can’t win the game as it’s typically played, and find out
what advantage your disadvantages give you. And while it’s fun
learning the true story behind a classic Bible battle, and the
struggles of iconic leaders like Lawrence of Arabia and Martin Luther
King Jr., I would recommend reading “Outliers”, “Blink” and
“Tipping Point” before picking up this latest Gladwell book.

1 comment:
I agree with your review that Gladwell's latest did not live up to the standards he set in "Outliers" and 'Blink." His earlier books enabled you to examine issues from a different perspective and helped you notice important factors you might have previously overlooked. This book was too many platitudes and not enough insight.
Post a Comment